On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.28.1737 +0100]: > > If Debian had slightly less of a culture of "Keep your hands off > > my package", I'd do it here instead. > > I've been thinking about this a lot for the past week. > > Is there any way this could be changed?
Yes, and we could start by really enforcing co-maintainership. Make it 100% mandatory for all essential, required and base packages at first. Co-maintainers are much closer to what is being done in a package than joe-random developer. Also, co-maintainership is far less prone to fire-and-forget uploads that hose things, and are nicer to people who feel very strongly about their packages. IMO, if we could reach a better level of resilience, lower response times, and agility with co-maintainership, it would be better than going to the extreme Ubuntu did. > Does Debian *want* it changed? I personally would welcome it. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]