Hi, On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:56:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > In my opinion, the current lilypond in Debian is not suitable for > release, even with the existing problems solved. It would not be > appropriate to release such an old version in etch, and if nothing > happens with python by the time etch is released, then lilypond should > be removed from etch.
This is utterly unacceptable. What do you do of the reverse-dependencies? If you are not capable of dealing with a package that you are supposed to maintain, you should O: it or RFA: it, instead of cornering users. That is irresponsible as a Debian Developer, low, and lame. I am very disappointed. :( Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
