On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 23 juillet 2006 à 01:07 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > Yes, and Bill continues to ignore it, as well as ignoring my > > posts to his bug reports (such as #368481) asking for specifics of how > > individual instances of dependency loops cause problems. > Hasn't there been enough random bugs caused by circular dependencies? > How many of them do you need before starting to fix your packages? > > Furthermore, there is no real justification for the circular dependency > in debconf. Why don't you just fix it?
I fail to see how the circular depends between tasksel and tasksel-data would cause any bug though. I agree it's best to fix circular deps in general, but it's not necessarily required each time. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
