On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > For example: > > Dovecot uses </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem>. > > This is a symbolic link to </etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem> if > the above file or link does not exist during configuration of > dovecot. > > That way, the admin can easily replace the symlink with a real > certificate if they want per-service certificates. > > If, however, they want to have one real certificate for everything, > they can replace the snakeoil certificate like Martin Pitt proposed. Sorry if I misunderstand something, but is it okay to call it snakeoil if it is real certificate? I like to say that the symbolic links for per-service certificate shouldn't point to something called snake-oil.
Just my opinion. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
