* Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 21:48]: > Excuse me for chiming in, but I think many places simply look > for the best performance and productivity/dollar(euro). We do use the PGI > compiler, > mostly because gnu had not had a f90-f95 compiler, and partly because > of, maybe, a 10% improvement in speed. > > What I find interesting is that both Fedora and Debian have similar > problems for different reasons. Debian has now stable release for > AMD64 because Sarge was released before AMD64 was really ready. This means > that we are all stuck in the beta test-site pool. It would be really nice > if Debian actually packaged up a "stable-like" version of AMD64 at the > same level as Sarge. Fedora has been moving so quickly, that they have > incorporated the same problems into a nominally stable release. http://amd64.debian.net/ http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00005.html
yours Martin -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---- Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System <formorer> $macht-- * HE .oO(Macht einer weniger?) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
