* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > * Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase > > > > is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to > > > > the MPL as far as Mozilla is concerned is fairly academic at this > > > > point. > > > > > > Seriously? That's absolutely great. Is there any sort of announcement of > > > this anywhere? > > > > Seriously: > > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/relicensing_complete.html. > > Actually, only the trunk has the relicensing complete, and the trunk is > Firefox 3. Firefox 2 will still be in the same state as previous > releases, but we know most of its code is available in upstream cvs in a > really triple licensed form.
Really? Gerv's post is incorrect? > > I'm hoping to have Firefox 2.0 part of etch, but with the aggressive > > release schedule it may not happen. > > I'm hoping to have Firefox 2.0beta1 uploadable to experimental somewhat soon. > Firefox 2.0 final itself is supposed to be released in august (but more > likley in september) I was thinking about doing that myself :) > It might not be impossible to have it in etch (and would be preferable, > since upstream will stop support of Firefox 2 6 months after release > of Firefox 3, which is itself due Q1 2007). Oh I certainly don't think it's impossible, but the timing is tight. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
