On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:28:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:48:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > That doesn't add up. Since <> never sends mail, there will never be > > a sender verification callback TO that address either. > > Some sites verify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses before accepting mail with sender > [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
That seems reasonable. If you're sending as [EMAIL PROTECTED] you should accept callbacks for it, and likewise you're required to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
