Quoting Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Since most packages currently > do not do this, some of our infrastructure (in casu, buildd machines) > assume this is not being done. Doing it anyway then might upset those > machines -- not just on m68k; when there was talk of a 6-way SPARC > buildd machine being set up, I understand that the plan there was to run > multiple instances of the buildd software on that machine, rather than > having parallel builds run[1]. Having five or six build processes all do > 'make -j 4' might grind even the most powerful of machines to a halt.
[overly nagging] When the talk about the hijacking of Bacula was up, the consensus was 'who cares about the m68k? If they can't keep up, get more machines'. I didn't like it then, and I don't like it any more now... And i don't even HAVE a m68k machine any more! -- spy Delta Force Kennedy cryptographic Marxist Serbian critical arrangements 747 quiche supercomputer SDI PLO Ortega AK-47 [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] [Or http://www.europarl.eu.int/tempcom/echelon/pdf/rapport_echelon_en.pdf] If neither of these works, try http://www.aclu.org and search for echelon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
