On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > If the content we're merging is free, there's no problem show this to the > > reviewer and let him accept or refuse the translation. It's way simpler to > > do > > than rewrite everything again. If the translation was overwritten in a > > 'source' (eg: > > Rosetta), we should show the translation we've and the alternative > > translations as suggestions. > > This is mor eor less how I see the future system to deal with > conflicting translations. In short, any translation will have an > "owner" and all "concurrent" translations will be handled as suggested > changes.
Who does decide which files are being imported? How are translations pushed upstream? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
