On Wed, 07 Jun 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I have always thought that when bug X is blocking bug Y, the severity > of bug X should be at least as big as the severity of bug Y. > > I have recently been told by a maintainer that my logic in this regard > is faulty. Is it?
Depends on how you are going to use the blocking facility, I suppose. I do agree with your reasoning, though: if Y is critical and cannot be fixed without fixing X, X is also critical. It doesn't matter at all what priority X would have IF it were not a blocker for Y: at the moment it became a blocker for Y, it became part of the problem causing Y. This works well if the BTS is taught to keep transitive severity status (i.e. it raises X's severity while it blocks Y, but as soon as it is not blocking Y anymore, X's severity should downgrade to what it once was). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
