In linux.debian.legal MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The package maintainer did not ask debian-legal (serious bug) and I'm They do not need to.
>really surprised that the archive maintainers felt no need to consult >developers about this licence, in public or private, or SPI, before >agreeing to indemnify Sun so broadly. They do not need too. >I've not actively worked on this so far because: I fear thinking about what you could have done if you had chosen to be more active... >4. there's already working java in main; and I wish. (Well, actually I don't. I despise java and I am happy if it will continue to be hard to use, but pretending that the free java implementations are a replacement for the Sun implementation is bullshit.) >-legal seems to have believed what Sun says their license means, namely debian-legal is just a mailing list and does not hold beliefs. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
