also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.02.0830 +0200]: > Why do you replace initramfs-tools and not just initramfs-tools << 0.60 > (or 0.63 as is the version you conflict with)?
Mh, that's a human error. Thanks for spotting it. > Also, depending on makedev | udev would be more correct, wouldn't > it? Well, not until I have worked out what to do about makedev. Since mdadm can now properly create nodes as needed, I think it would be okay to do without makedev and simply let them be created on-demand. Or is the policy to be interpreted that I must not do that and should create them in postinst no matter what? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system $complex->{'data'}[$structures][$in_perl] = @{$can{'be'}->[$painful]};
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
