On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I am actually quite ambivalent about whether I think what he did was > wrong; I think to determine that I would need to read carefully what > the KSP organizers said. Martin certainly should follow the protocols > established, but I would only count "established" as being what is > actually written down by the KSP organizers, and not just some kind of > general unspoken expectation. (Where can I read about those written > protocols, if there are any?)
From http://debconf6.debconf.org/ksp/ksp-dc6.html: " The next step is to verify each participant's identity by checking preferably a passport or, alternatively, some other form of government issued ID. Please don't show very old, doubtful or easy-to-fake documents as people will not sign your key if you do so. " I guess that answers the questions you brought up in your e-mail. An ID from a political party is *not* a government issued ID and *is* a doubtful document. Regards Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
