On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:21:53AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > There is nothing preferable about it. Stop targets *are* to exit with > status 0 if the service is already stopped. > > The fact that Debian policy still has this as a "should" clause is just > cruft that needs to be addressed. There are absolutely no acceptable > exceptions to either this rule (stopping a stopped service is okay) nor to > its counterpart (starting an already started service is okay), as far as I > know. >
Absolutely ack. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
