> Juha> These are different, why? According to man id "id" and "id > Juha> <currently logged on user>" are the same. > The first one shows the groups that are assigned to the current > process, the second one shows the default list of groups the user will > get when logging in again.
Ach, I did not know this, but it is not the issue here since they were
both issued on a brand-new ssh session; i.e. they should have provided
the same list.
> That is normal for AFS. Normally I believe AFS only uses two groups
> though, something strange here.
Yep, which is why I doubt they can be the culprit here. Russ, however,
seems to think it's possible. Given the comment Aaron Ucko, I am inclined
to agree with Russ. This is not the whole story, however.
I have an X (started with gdm) session, where any shell will give me
~> id
uid=1000(juhaj) gid=1000(juhaj)
groups=33636,38650,4(adm),24(cdrom),29(audio),40(src),44(video),1000(juhaj),33636,38649
If I ssh from within this X session to the machine, I get *the exact same
list* - even in the same order this time! The plain shell cannot
access /var/log/syslog, but the shell over ssh can. The file is 644
root.adm.
A side note: on *this* machine, I *can* access the cdrom, but on the one
I originally pasted the id outputs, I could not. Go figure?
> I am not convinced it is a good idea to define the group both on the
> system and in LDAP. I prefer to keep low level system groups in
> /etc/group and high level user groups in LDAP.
This is exactly what I am after, but it does not seem to work. =(
> Try bypassing the AFS login stuff (if possible) and see if it changes
> anything.
That would be quite nasty since it would mean throwing away $HOME. If I
log in from a getty, I can access /var/log/syslog (or /dev/hdc)
regardless whether I obtain the AFS PAG or not. I can *only* reproduce
this problem on
a) machine A, user juhaj, file /var/log/syslog, X/gdm
b) machine B, user X, file /dev/hdc, X/gdm
I can work around these by
a) from within X ssh to localhost
b) log in from vt[1-6]
Both users belong to their "uid-group" both in LDAP and /etc/group, both
users also have a corresponding uid in /etc/{passwd,shadow}. These extra
groups are relics which I have not thought necessary to remove; accounts
in /etc/{passwd,shadow} exist because sudo won't work otherwise. (Our
users are accustomed to sudo, not "ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]" with .k5login
allowing them to log in. Perhaps I could globally 'alias sudo="ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"' and edit /root/.k5login accordingly on each machine?)
What should I try next? =)
-Juha
--
-----------------------------------------------
| Juha Jäykkä, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Laboratory of Theoretical Physics |
| Department of Physics, University of Turku |
| home: http://www.utu.fi/~juolja/ |
-----------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
