Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 19 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow outgrape:
>
> setools is in the list, and contains libraries that it uses
> itself, but does not break it up into multiple installed
> packages. Setools is moving rapidly rnough that I do not intend to
> support multiple versions of the libraries until things stabilize a
> bit.
>
> However, people do build binaries against these libraries, and
> even have private packages, and I intend to support that.
I think that Policy 8.2 is fully applicable to your package then. It
is a MUST directive so your unwillingness to allow multiple versions
of your library to coexist does not affect the violation.
Following 8.2 you only have 2 choices: Split the package or provide
only static libaries and live with the wasted space. Otherwise the
packages is RC buggy.
My 2c,
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
