Please STOP resetting the forwarded address and revert the changes you already did. We do loose information in the upstream BTS: it becomes more tedious to track the reverse direction (upstream -> Debian), unless you add information to the upstream bug report as well. I.e. you have to search now _every_ duplicate report to find the one which was reported in Debian. That's insane when a report has a large number of duplicates.
I don't mind adding information to the BTS, but removing information from it is just insane. Thanks, Matthias Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # > > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4 > > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html > > # > > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > # remote status report for #217360 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 217360 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027 > Bug#217360: [PR12867, fixed in 3.5] incorrect warning message (void format, > should be void* format) > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12867 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 217360 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #238432 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 238432 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801 > Bug#238432: [fixed in 4.0] gcj fails to wait for its child processes on exec() > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14709 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11801. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 238432 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #254659 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 254659 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052 > Bug#254659: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16066 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16052. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 254659 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #285692 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 285692 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384 > Bug#285692: [fixed in 3.4/4.0] [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in > tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3255 > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19006 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18384. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 285692 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #286715 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 286715 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157 > Bug#286715: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 19711] gcj segfaults instead of reporting the > ambiguous expression > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19711 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9157. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 286715 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #293466 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > forwarded 293466 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309 > Bug#293466: [PR 19265] [fixed in 4.0] g++-3.4: mt_allocator + threads + > dlclose = crash > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19265 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22309. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > usertags 293466 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #307993 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * upstream said bug is wontfix > > forwarded 307993 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676 > Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at dwarf2out.c:10913 building glibc > 2.3.5 with nptl > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21457 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16676. > (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > > > tags 307993 + upstream wontfix > Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at dwarf2out.c:10913 building glibc > 2.3.5 with nptl > Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream > Tags added: upstream, wontfix > > > usertags 307993 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED. > > # remote status report for #331265 > > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592 > > # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> RESOLVED > > # * closed upstream > > forwarded 331265 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592 > Bug#331265: [fixed in 4.0] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification > Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24171 to > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21592. > > > tags 331265 + fixed-upstream > Bug#331265: [fixed in 4.0] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification > Tags were: wontfix upstream > Tags added: fixed-upstream > > > usertags 331265 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED > There were no usertags set. > Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. > > thanks > Stopping processing here. > > Please contact me if you need assistance. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
