On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:02:57AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> For Etch and Sid, it is probably a good idea to use -Os instead of -O2 at > least on the bigger arches (ia32, ia64, amd64, etc), as we can probably > trust gcc not to screw up. If gcc generally generates faster code with -Os than -O2, then isn't that a gcc bug, in that the optimizations enabled by -O2 are incorrectly picked? [Also, are there that man AMD64 machines with limited memory? Or IA64?] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
