On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]: > > > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken > > > > from > > > > me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the issue ? > > > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/03/msg01075.html sounds like > > > you stepped back, and > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/03/msg00490.html confirms > > > that. > > > > I stepped back from d-i powerpc port maintainer, not as d-i contributor. > > So there apparently was a misunderstanding.
No, there was a deliberate intention for revenge and hurting. I doubt any of the other d-i contributors commit right where removed when they stopped contributing, and there must be over a 100 such dormant contributors by now. > > Also, i don't believe there is any justification for taking away svn commit > > access except when there was a clear misuse of it being made. > > > > So, basically, you are saying that it is ok to take commit right away > > because > > of personal dislike situations like apparently happened here ? > > It is OK to remove svn access for a person which stepped down from d-i > activity (see above) imho, yes. who was kicked out you mean ? > > Again, i ask you, what possible reason where there to take svn commit access > > away from me ? > > See above. That is no reply. I don't believe such was done in any of the other previous cases, at least not without months of waiting and at least a ping tentative. So tell me, could this really be interpreted as anythind else than a tentative to get ride of me ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
