If you have not noticed yet, the latest udev release by default automatically generates rules to have persistent names for network interfaces.
I am inclined to agree with the bug reporter, but I want to double check and ask if anybody has other arguments. On Apr 20, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Besides the fact that ifrename is more of a hack, now that udev enables > persistent naming of interfaces (z25_persistent-net.rules) udev should > conflict with ifrename. Otherwise the user could get unexpected results > if /etc/iftab still exists and the ifrename init script tries to rename the > interfaces (again) with possibly different names than the ones set in > z25_persistent-net.rules. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
