On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Christian Marillat:
> > >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > >> Where are you reading that ?
> > >
> > > An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
> > > them is expressly allowed under the "other changes" option.
> > 
> > I'm sorry but no. Read again. The Debian changelog is for Debian changes
> > not upstream. For that we have a changelog file and a NEW file.
> > 
> >       Changes in the Debian version of the package should be briefly
> >       explained in the Debian changelog file `debian/changelog'.[1] This
> >       includes modifications made in the Debian package compared to the
> >       upstream one as well as other changes and updates to the package.
> 
> Does it say that everything else is specifically excluded?  Do you
> really have nothing better to do with your life than argue semantics
> about an ambiguous sentence[0].
> 
> Please get off this list and do something more productive with your
> time.

... like dealing with his own bugs in a proper way.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to