On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Christian Marillat: > > >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > [...] > > > > >> Where are you reading that ? > > > > > > An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing > > > them is expressly allowed under the "other changes" option. > > > > I'm sorry but no. Read again. The Debian changelog is for Debian changes > > not upstream. For that we have a changelog file and a NEW file. > > > > Changes in the Debian version of the package should be briefly > > explained in the Debian changelog file `debian/changelog'.[1] This > > includes modifications made in the Debian package compared to the > > upstream one as well as other changes and updates to the package. > > Does it say that everything else is specifically excluded? Do you > really have nothing better to do with your life than argue semantics > about an ambiguous sentence[0]. > > Please get off this list and do something more productive with your > time.
... like dealing with his own bugs in a proper way. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]