On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:18 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the > > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches? > > > > But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in > > OpenSolaris-based derivatives, such as NexentaOS? And I'd like to > > putback libxslt change (and similar) to upstream, so other derivative > > will not be polluted with mis-provided packages. > > So why not have an OpenSolaris core set of metapackages, with a sunwlxsl > package that Depends on libxslt1, instead of polluting every package > with this port-specific stuff?
Indeed. I think this is a right way to go, and in fact, would be easier to maintain over time, since all glue meta information would be concentrated in one place. -- Erast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
