On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > So what do you people suggest in such cases: > > > 1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ? > > > 2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ? > > > 3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the > > > patches ? > > > 4) Wait! That hardware isn't officially supported by us. Build only > > > machines > > > which are known to work with Debian Stable? > > > 5) etch beta 2 was released last week with support for your hardware > > If this is the issue I think it is, sarge does support the hardware but the > kernel isn't configured to support large frames on it in GigE mode. I'm not > aware that this issue has been resolved yet in the kernels for etch either; > the issue had earlier been clouded by concerns over the reliability of this > kernel configure option, owing to confusion with a similarly named option > for a different card.
Would that really be *the* issue for a NAT box?
