#include <hallo.h> * Bastian Blank [Thu, Mar 16 2006, 07:19:22PM]: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:51:05PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > WTF has this to do with Sven now? > > Maybe because Sven and I worked on a solution for this problem.
Hoookay... > > However, I have been told that it is no > > longer allowed to upload binary packages that do not appear in control > > files of the source package that are claimed to be the source of the > > uploaded binary package. > > It was never allowed. I am sure it was (a while ago) but since snapshot.debian.net is busted is is hard to proove that. > > a way to tell FTP management: packages of that kind are okay and they > > shall be removed when the following package disappears: ... Maybe a new > > field? Eg. > > > > GenPkgBaseName: unionfs-module- > > How should that work? It needs the information which packages are built > and which are not. Which this proposal you will end with many > not-longer-built packages. This is the other side of the medal, yes. I cannot see any other efficient ways now, I guess you do but you don't care to tell. > > Having the meaning: packages matching /^unionfs-module-(.*)/ and declaring > > the > > mentioned source package as source are installed automaticaly, and are > > removed automaticaly from the archive when the package linux-image-$1 > > is removed. > > Forget it. The archive only have equal matches. > > > Any better ideas? > > Yes, let us finish our work. > > Bastian Is that's all? No shit, I miss "STFU and let us alone in our sandbox" for the perfect satisfaction. :-( Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
