On 3/13/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > 20:38 < Ganneff> the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not > > > process > > > NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that > > > more. > > > > Well, if that's the reason, are updates to existing source packages > > still allowed? I'd really like to fix my RC bugs and sync with upstream > > at the same time but the latter would involve so-version changes. > > This is not the reason for any backlog, although it does limit amount of > NEW accepts per day, but there's still plenty of room in each day to do > a lot of NEW. The bigger bottleneck is simply human processing time. >
It's clear for me that the NEW packages/per month processing time is way better than sometime ago, thanks the ftpmasters for this. The unsolved problems at this moment (as i see them) are: - Some packages aren't accepted or rejected and stay there for too much time with a unknown reason. If the ftpmasters agree we should add more information in the NEW queue page[0] than the reject-faq; - The process stopped for some time and some people thought it was due the archive split. It's a HR issue or a PR issue and can be solved easily IMHO.; [0] = http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -- stratus
