Am 2006-02-18 13:58:20, schrieb Jérôme Marant:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is your point that contrib should therefore be empty and has no reason for
> > existance?
> >
> > If not, please explain me the difference between ndiswrapper and all the
> > other
> > packages that belong to contrib and already are in.
>
> Contrib is for free packages that have a real "Depends:" or
> "Recommends:" dependency on a non-free package.
>
> If there isn't any reason for ndiswrapper to depends on a non-free
> package, then there is no reason to move it to contrib.
Right, and because it DOES NOT depends
on "non-free" it should stay in "main".
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
