Le jeudi 09 février 2006 à 23:50 +0100, Jérôme Marant a écrit : > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > >> On Feb 09, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> This was necessary only because the release manager believed the changes > >>> to be non-editorial. I cannot even understand an interpretation of the > >>> old wording that can lead us to accept non-free documentation into main. > > > >> This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an > >> interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to > >> accept non-free documentation into main. > > > > How is this relevant? > > Consistency?
There is nothing like consistency in someone asserting that "Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software" means "98% free software and 2% non-free other things". -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
