On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 07:14:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 18:55 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > > > Because python and ruby have similar features, and the former is more > > > widely spread and used. > > > > I disagree. Ruby has one feature that python does not have: Ruby does > > not require you to use a certain specific coding style. > > This is only a feature for perl maniacs. A language that requires a > specific coding style is better, because it makes possible for anyone > knowing the language to hack easily python code he doesn't know about.
Hah. A language that does not require a specific coding style is better, because it allows me to work as is the most efficient for me. -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
