On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:33:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Sunday 22 January 2006 03:16, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Since all Ubuntu packages are recompiled against a different set of > > libraries, the bug might not even affect the Debian package, even though > > they share the same source. Hence having Ubuntu developers triage the > > bugs to rule out such issues before they are forwarded to Debian's BTS > > is always a good thing; thus the maintainer field should be changed > > for *binary packages*. The source is the same, so the field should NOT > > be changed for *source packages*. > > Given Ubuntu hopelessly complicates everything, pretends there is cooperation > where there is none, and merely duplicates the effort of the debian-desktop > project, and contributes nothing to the community or society, what's stopping > us from officially discouraging Ubuntu's existence?
Wow, just when I thought you couldn't be a bigger tool you write this. I've had great experiences working with Ubuntu developers (who are, quite simply, often Debian developers and thus part of our little tribe) and I look forward to more of the same. Maybe the next time you start trying to do some real work for Debian rather than troll -project you'll find this out for yourself. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
