On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Olaf van der Spek wrote: > [..] > >>> A lot of those bugs are quite old and some appear to be trivial to > >>> fix, but they don't have a single response from you. > >>> Could you please tell why? > >> Most likely because the bugs are non-issues and should simply be closed. > > > > Really? Interesting. Why do you think they are non-issues? > > See below... > > >> Which bug report exactly seems to cause problems for you? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341022 > > As stated in the bug report, a configerror that happens _after_ the > 'administrator' has modified it.
Like I stated in the bug report, that still doesn't make the vhost conf the right place for that directive. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267477 > > There is no 'simple' way of doing this, especially as people who want And why is that? Lots of additional steps can be automated. > SSL either need to create a snakeoil certificate or want to use their > own. It can't be automated, people should simply read the documentation, > which is already included. > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289868 > > As marked by ASF: Invalid bug. As the ASF said, the Debian conf is not the same as the upstream conf, so the ASF's resolution doesn't apply to Debian. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291841 > > Ever ran a log analysis program? No, is that relevant? > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=325594 > > Just kill the old one, start the new one. That's a work around, not a solution. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338472 > > Both /server-info and /server-status are commented out. > If somebody wants to enable them they can also stick them > directly in the virtualhost they want. > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=349016 > > Wishlist item. And those don't reserve any response? > Any bugs which are deadly and critical except for the fact that you > don't want to read documentation a bit? Why do bugs need to be deadly or critical?
