On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:04:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate > >> perl too, but really, the argument "hey, people like Python too" > >> implies that we should have a scheme interpreter, a perl, a python, > >> emacs lisp, and well, everything anyone might want. > > > > Ubuntu developers would like to be able to use Python. So far there has > > been no demand whatsoever for LISP derivatives in this context. > > Ok; Joe Wreschnig just said that "I would like to write scripts in X" > is certainly not a good enough reason to add X to Essential. It > sounds as if you are in disagreement with him; have I understood > correctly.?
I have said repeatedly that I am not expressing an opinion about what Debian does with regard to python-minimal. The only reason I am participating in this thread is to answer questions about what we did in Ubuntu and why, and I think I've done that thoroughly now. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
