On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 06:06:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:08:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: > > >mplayer has had an explicit warning from upstream that it's patented; > > The proposed tarball for Debian has stuff excised left and right in > > order to guarantee legality. Just check that the patented stuff was > > excised, right? > > If you can demonstrate that there's nothing in there that's potentially > patented, sure. That seems pretty unlikely, though.
Aren't we in a similar situation with other stuff that is in main already? rsync springs to mind. regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
