On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:05:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:34:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > If we followed the same method for python-base, then we would > > > > > > a) instroduce python-base iff we had some package(s) written in python > > > that we wanted in the base system (apt-listchanges comes to mind) > > > b) include only the modules needed by the package(s). > > > > Please don't do this; it implies that python-minimal would be part of base, > > but not full python, and this is something that python upstream explicitly > > objects to. > > It implies no such thing.
If you won't acknowledge that, then know that upstream also object to the name "python-base" for something which has a stripped-down standard library. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
