Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem also isn't our machines but some mirror in > low-diskspace-land.
The amount of disk it takes to carry a complete Debian copy is simply going to be increasing. We have to tradeoff dropping a mirror or two against the costs of weakening the distribution by leaving out important things. (And really, data about which mirrors would be dropped would help: maybe we can buy *them* a disk. Disks are cheap!) >> Mirrors that don't want to carry the additional arch shouldn't have >> to; this should be easy to arrange. > > Given the recent mail about the mirror split this seems to finaly get > started. So far all primary mirrors HAD to carry all archs. Yes, this has been a long time in coming and I'm glad that it has begun to move. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
