Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If that were true, you wouldn't be having this conversation with me. It is > costing me an unreasonable amount of time to deal with this trivial issue, > and I've spent a disproportionate amount of it going in circles with you. > I'm quickly losing interest in discussing this with you at all, to be > honest.
Then, um, don't. Doesn't affect me either way. >> You have not ever shown a serious interest in what Debian would like. > > This is, again, insulting, and nonsensical in the face of the repeated > dialogues I have initiated and participated in with Debian developers > regarding Ubuntu practices. Can you describe the cases in which you have altered your practices in response to the views of Debian developers? I refer not to technical decisions or particular patches, but rather, things on the level of policy and overall structure. As far as I can tell, you have not done any such. This makes it seem unlikely that you really are willing to entertain such changes. Perhaps, though, I have missed. You have attempted to convince Debian that what you are doing is already cooperation, but that is not the same thing as a serious interest in what Debian would like. Instead, you have tried to convince us that what you are providing is what we should like. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
