On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:23:51PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 1/14/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > (...) > > > Exactly my point Matthew, and calm down David, i wrote: "e.g.: David > > > said that Daniel helped him, but if he did that in his workhours it's > > > under Canonical bless.". Do you see ? I just pointed out that there's > > > a possibility that he was helping you in his workhours, but i won't > > > cite you as a reference anymore. > > > > > > -- > > > Gustavo Franco > > Hi Gustavo, > > Is it within the scope of Canonical employees to contribute code to > > Debian that is under the his copyright and not Canonical's? And > > especially since it is in the exact same area that he was employed by > > Canonical to do? Would this apply to Progeny and Debian, Progeny and > > Canonical, Linspire and ... > > Hi Kevin, > > I think that Matt Zimmerman (mdz) knows the answer.
I'm not sure I understand the question, but if Kevin is asking whether code contributions to Debian by Canonical employees are copyrighted by Canonical? If so, the answer is "sometimes". -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
