On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:27:31 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:26:25AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:35:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> > I believe Ubuntu fills an important gap in the Debian world and
>> > as such
>> Ubuntu is not part of the Debian world, because it does not share
>> the values that found Debian.
> That's kind of a strange position to take, isn't it? Does this mean
> that the many users who use Debian directly sheerly on technical
> excellence alone, without sharing Debian's "founding values", are
> not part of the "Debian world"? For that matter, I don't know of
> any derivative Debian distributions that require their developers to
> agree to the social contract; so by that standard, are *any* of them
> part of the "Debian world"?
The context here is whether announcements from such groups
are on topic on d-d-a. I have a local LUG where lots of people use
Debian -- and there are debian based install fests and so on (and
talks, and BOF meetings over beer and pizza). I am not sure I think
gating the announcements from my LUG to the d-d-a list is
appropriate.
In this context, we have a low volume lists that all
developers are supposed to subscribe to, and keeping the noise in the
mailing list down is probably best.
manoj
--
You seek to shield those you love and you like the role of the
provider.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
