On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:24:06PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> >> If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the > >> >> first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at > >> >> the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may > >> >> be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for > >> >> this one yet. > > >> I was perfectly serious. This is merely the latest in a number of > >> things Mr Suffield has done which are detrimental to the project in a > >> number of ways. Some of these are not a matter of public record, so > >> you would be unaware of them. > > > > I hope you realise that if I were the litigious type, you would be > > receiving a court summons in the next day or two (it's lies, btw, for > > those of you watching - I hope nobody bought that 'secret offenses' > > noise, it's like the PATRIOT act or something). > > The events are a recorded in the debian-private archives, which I am > not permitted to reveal here. I have at no point stated anything > which is untrue, and any Debian developer who wishes to verify it may > look at the August 2005 archives (debian-private.200508.gz on > master:~debian/archive/debian-private is the worst to date). That is > not disclosable on this list.
In this archive I express the opinion that just because somebody died, that does not permit random developers to go around making statements on behalf of other developers. Not even "person X is sorry for your loss". Not without the permission of person X. If making a stand for simple integrity is so terrible, then colour me terrible. I do not see what is so bad about objecting to people making statements, on behalf of other people, without their permission. [Obviously I can't repost or significantly report on all the stuff people said to villify me and misrepresent my position as being anything other than the above, but it's not relevant anyway] I fail to see how expressing a simple opinion like that, which is not even an uncommon one, *on a private mailing list*, could possibly be 'detrimental to the project'. That is pure slander. > If you do reply, please do so in -private. If you do reply, please do so in public. I will not stand for any more of this hiding behind unverifiable statements. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
