* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 19:36]: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]: > >> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > * Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]: > >> >> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages > >> >> > without maintained rdepends from testing? > >> >> > >> >> Seconded. > >> > > >> > well, just make a list that I can just copy into my hint file. > >> > >> Hm, I can't find the context: Are you talking about all such packages, > >> or only packages with RC bugs? > > > > The ones that are orphaned for some time. If we see it doesn't work or > > is not worth, we can change that back of course. > > I can't see why removing an orphaned package that has no RC bugs, and > let's say, even no important bugs, and which is stable in the sense that > there's no new upstream version (e.g. an established font), from testing > makes testing's quality better. What about a hypothetical package that > has no bugs at all, but some users according to popcon?
One can try to come up with some metric, yes. However, on the other hand feel free to create a "common maintained packages team" that adopts such packages :) Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
