Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu: >> Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus on this idea of >> > "every Ubuntu changeset, a patch in Debian BTS" between DDs. >> Right. I want Ubuntu to exercise judgment, and not just give a big >> pile of patches, some of which are Debian-relevant and some of which >> are not. Think, for example, of the normal way a Debian developer >> should interact with upstream. > > This is exactly the point, what can I do with a patch if I don't know > why it's there? Which problem is it trying to address (I know, I can > read the patch and guess, but WTF), and why such solution was adopted... > Everytime I submit a patch, I also submit this reasoning...
Of course, but Ubuntu doesn't submit patches.
