On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:01PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:35PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > > > On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > > > > > I don't[sic] the same rant over others Debian related companies > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you ever actually subscribed to any Debian mailing lists? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't be fooled by From mail headers. > > > > > > > > Well, I've sure seen similar things being said about nearly every > > > > Debian-related company I've ever heard of (Progeny, Linspire, Nexenta, > > > > etc). I find it hard to see how else you could have missed them. > > > > > > I agree with "similar things being said" but i'm yet to hear about the > > > lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. > > > > None of the other companies ran around pronouncing how great they were > > at 'giving things back' and how 'committed' they were to free > > software, etcetera. That appears to be the relevant point. > > > > I don't think anybody seriously objects to the existence of companies > > who *don't* do these things. > > Are you saying that they're spending more money with PR than really > contributing back ?
I don't know about money, but I'm pretty sure their claims exceed their actions. I think that a sufficient response is to point this out whenever people start worshipping Canonical in public. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
