Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le mercredi 04 janvier 2006 à 14:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : >> On Jan 04, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > udev has broken my system -- completely (as in: can't boot and/or log in) >> > -- >> > _seven_ distinct times since this summer. How on you can claim that ALSA is >> > worse, is beyond me :-) >> This was not always caused by udev bugs. >> And anyway, it's called unstable for a reason. udev in stable is stable. > > Unstable means dependencies can be broken, not that packages themselves > can always broken. Each and every single package uploaded to unstable > should be of release quality. Otherwise, it should go to experimental.
Dude, how many people do you think would test a udev package in experimental? I could count them on one hand. It's impossible to get a package like udev to be of "release quality" if no one tests it. -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
