Op ma, 02-01-2006 te 11:24 +0100, schreef Andreas Fester: > > (No, I don't really think titles will attract most of the productive > > kind contributors to Debian. Sorry.) > > I agree that "title" might not be appropriate. Thats why I primarily > talked about "stages" (maybe there is a better word...), which should > somehow reflect the knowledge and the contribution to the project. > Today, there is only "Developer". They have @debian.org email > address, they can upload packages, they have voting rights etc.
How is that a problem? FWIW, I personally think that as it is, we already have way too much bureaucracy in how we recruite new developers. I agree we should put a line somewhere regarding who we let in and who we don't, but that shouldn't be done by making it a process with more rules and regulations which, accumulated, takes longer than the process to become a police officer or so. If even that. > At the Apache Software Foundation, for example, there is the > "Committer" wo has write access to one or more CVS/SVN repositories, > and who also has an @apache.org email address. But no voting rights. That's a horrible idea. > For Debian, for example, the permission to upload packages should still > be restricted to the most experienced people (Developers) who > can review the package quality. So you're not really changing anything then, are you? What's the problem? -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
