Lars Wirzenius wrote:
[Less strong "ownership" of packages.
> This idea hasn't been tested. It could be tested if
> some group of maintainers declared that some or all
> of their packages were part of the experiment, that
> anyone could NMU them for any reason whatsoever, as
> long as they take proper care not to mess the package
> up.
>
> (I'm willing to participate in such an experiment
> myself, but I haven't thought out the details yet.)
Why don't we add a status field into the PTS, where a maintainer
can denote her "NMU policy" for a given source package? E.g.
a selection box, ranging from "Don't dare to touch this, I bite"
to "Feel free to 0d-NMU for every severity as long a you send the
patch". Or a free-form field, if that doesn't suffice.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
