On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Yeah; vi not behaving like vi by default seems like a showstopper.
But that is not the case. vi by default not acting like a very old and (imho) broken version of vi... is not a showstopper. I love vi - and I love the progress vim has made to make use of vi quicker/better/easier. I don't see that the world has to be stuck in 1985 - should we still be shipping a linux kernel version 1? -- Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
