MJ Ray wrote:
> The increase is between 101% for ia64 and 58% for i386.
> vim-tiny+vim-common is smallish by current standards, but
> neither "about the same" as nvi, nor "only marginally larger".
> Was there a maths error near the top of this thread?

The very top of this thread contained a forwarded message containing the
text "(776 + 232 on i386)". If you're trying to imply some sort of error
it might help if you pointed to a message-id.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to