Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> A simple assurance that your package will be rejected from the NEW queue >>> if no ftp-master approves it within 2 weeks would actually be a benefit. >> Why? >> It seems like, if that's the way that you want the world to work, you >> could already just pretend that this is the case. If your package has >> gone for more than two weeks, it seems to me like you could decide to >> treat it in all respects as if it had been rejected and just go on with >> your life. If it ends up getting accepted, you could orphan it, or >> decide to pick it up again. > When the ftp masters reject a package, they say why it has been rejected > as a rule. So at least that part can't be substituted for in this way. Yes, but that's a different conversation. Anand didn't say anything about getting a reason. The proposal was that packages be automatically rejected if no ftp-master approves it within two weeks. I don't understand how that helps anyone. You still don't get any explanation, and now there's not even a chance someone will find time to look at it. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
