On 29.11.05 Anthony DeRobertis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi,
> >>allrunes dfsg
> >>
> >>Please: Tell me its not true that the DFSG is used as a license
> >>there.
> >
> >
> > As stated in the License file, this list was generated from the
> > TeX Catalogue, which *can be wrong*! If you check the actual
> > allrunes files, you see that it is LPPL.
>
> I really hope you've done this --- for all files --- before
> uploading. Also, there are several versions of the LPPL, at least
> one of which might have DFSG issues.
>
If you allow me to drop a note: The license, which was used to
release teTeX 2.0 in sarge, is still the old one, which was said to
be problematic...
H.
--
Whatever doesn't succeed in two months and a half in California will
never succeed.
-- Rev. Henry Durant, founder of the University of California
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
