On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch > > and a lot even without a single response. > > This is not true.
What part isn't? > Stop bothering me. Why? > Most of the patches are not valid. Shouldn't the patch tag be removed and an explanation given then? > Please work on the bugs which are tagged as help needed. Why would I do that while I'm waiting for the status of the patch I already wrote? Olaf
