Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:54:12PM +0000, paddy wrote: > > >>>I though a robots.txt thingy on the list web archive is coming to the >>>rescue ? > > >>Huh? Isn't having the lists searchable generally a good thing? > > > Yes, a very good thing in general. But excluding specifically the > posts about c*llw*ve and d**l*ng b*nj*s might be worth a try. Of > course, that is if somebody can be bothered to keep such exclusion > lists up-to-date. > > On the other hand, l.d.o. is not the only place debian-devel is > publicly archived, so it might not be worth the trouble to try to > fix things locally.
It's not. When querying for "Call Wave remove", the top hits are on a message from opensubscriber.com. When googling for "callwave remove" we get a page on lists.debian.org: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html --Ken Bloom -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
